Forum Archive :
I played in my first F2F tournament in a while a few weeks back. Nine
players entered the non-expert division, meaning that two players did
not get a first-round bye and seven did.
I was wondering if tournaments have ever tried to equalize the effect
of byes by handicapping later matches. For example, suppose 12
players enter, playing 11-point matches. I don't have my match equity
table handy (or memorized) but it seems that leading 3-0 to 11 would
be about 67% match equity, roughly. It would seem to be fair, then,
that 8 players would play the first round, and each winner would start
the second-round match with a 3-0 lead. This would give each of the 12
players a 1/3 chance of reaching the third round.
Has anyone ever done this in practice?
Carlo Melzi writes:
Just a few time ago I started to study something similar, because one of
my friend gave me the idea. Unfortunately, some problems were just too
1) The system 67%-33% works only if the total numbers of players is 12 or
24, because there is the same number of byes and pre-turns.
In all the other situations, a player who had to play a pre-turn would
clearly prefer to play a player who had a bye in the second round, in
order to start with an advantage (67% vs. 50%).
Thus, we should re-arrange third, fourth (and so on) rounds to give the
same probability of winning the tournament to all the players AFTER the
I studied the "10-players" tournament and the math should be this:
A,B,C,D play a pre-turn. The winners (let's say A and C) play then E and F
having a score advantage that gives them 67% in the match.
G,H,I,L play normally their round.
In the semifinals, the winners of A-E and C-F should start with a 60%
advantage versus (let's say) G and I.
This way every player would have a 10% chance to win the tournament AFTER
As you can see, this is rather complicate (and it's even more with more
2) It's not always so easy to give precisely 66.67% in a match (in a 7pts
tournament, using Neil's Numbers, starting from 2-0 gives 63% and 3-0
gives 69.5%; 0 - -3 gives 66%.......but it's no more a 7pts tournament!!!
Steen Ladelund writes:
In Aarhus, Denmark where I live, we have a tournament every two weeks
where we auction the byes. I think this is a beutifull, simple and fair
way of dealing with byes in knock-out designs involving entry fees.
I wonder if its used elsewhere?
Steen Ladelund * Dep. of Theor. Statistics,
office H2.14 * University of Århus.
tlf: (+45) 8942 3499 * Ny Munkegade, bygn. 530
E-mail: email@example.com * 8000 Århus, Denmark.
- Adjusting to face-to-face play (Paul Epstein+, Feb 2006)
- Adjusting to face-to-face play (Daniel Murphy, June 1999)
- Avoiding disputes (Kit Woolsey+, Oct 2007)
- Baffle box to roll dice (Ken Bame, Mar 2012)
- Calcutta auctions (David Moeser, Nov 2001)
- Calcutta auctions (Roland Scheicher+, Dec 1998)
- Calcutta auctions (Anthony R Wuersch, Oct 1994)
- Calcutta problems (Marty Storer, Dec 2002)
- Clock ethics (Patrick Gibson+, Mar 2009)
- Clock rules--Digital clocks (Chuck Bower+, Oct 2003)
- Clock rules--End of turn (Carlo Melzi+, July 2001)
- Clock rules--How do they work? (Gregg Cattanach, Oct 2002)
- Clock rules--Illegal move (Brendan Burgess+, Feb 2000)
- Clock rules--Why forfeit instead of penalty points? (neilkaz, Sept 2010)
- Clocks and older players (Stick+, July 2010)
- Clocks--Arguments against them (Timothy Chow, Jan 2011)
- Clocks--Common arguments against (Chuck Bower, Feb 2006)
- Clocks--Losing on time (Jason Lee+, Mar 2004)
- Clocks--Pros and cons (Michael Strato+, Jan 2004)
- Clocks--Should they be part of the game? (Kit Woolsey, June 1995)
- Clocks--Why use them (Stick, Jan 2011)
- Compensating for byes (Hank Youngerman+, Dec 1998)
- Factors that affect attendance (Stick, Oct 2009)
- "Fighter's bracket" (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2010)
- First backgammon tournament (Mislav Radica+, May 2007)
- First backgammon tournament (Ed Collins+, Dec 2006)
- Hedging (Jason Lee+, Apr 2009)
- Hedging (Marv Porten+, Feb 2009)
- Hedging (Tad Bright+, Jan 2003)
- Hitting clock instead of rolling (Bob Glass+, Mar 2010)
- Keeping score during a match (Gregg Cattanach, June 2007)
- Links to tournament rules (Daniel Murphy, Oct 2009)
- Major tournament attendance 1998-2008 (Daniel Murphy, July 2008)
- Making notes during play (Randy Pals+, Aug 2008)
- Manually recording a match (Kevin P+, Apr 2007)
- Manually recording a match (gammonus+, Feb 2006)
- Manually recording a match (Daniel Murphy, Aug 1999)
- New U.S. Rules (Gregg Cattanach+, Dec 2007)
- Newbie questions (Donald Kahn, Oct 1999)
- Playing at Monte Carlo (Achim, July 2007)
- Playing-off 3 remaining players (Gregg Cattanach+, Apr 2007)
- Recording matches (Robert Maier, May 2009)
- Recording matches (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2003)
- Recording matches (Sean Dakin+, Aug 1999)
- Round robins (Hank Youngerman, Nov 2001)
- Rules for doubles play (with a partner) (steve+, May 2012)
- Seeding (Roland Scheicher+, Dec 1998)
- Skill level (Kirk J. Rupnik+, Nov 1998)
- Skill levels (Leonardo Jerkovic, Aug 2012)
- "Stop pots" (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2010)
- Swiss format (Osman Guner+, May 2001)
- Swiss format (Osman Guner, Oct 1998)
- Swiss format (Hank Youngerman+, Mar 1998)
- Tournament formats (MikeMadMonk+, May 2003)
- Tournament rules (Daniel Murphy, Apr 2001)
- Tournament rules links (Daniel Murphy, Oct 2009)
- Types of events (Daniel Murphy, Nov 1997)
- Uniform rules and procedures? (Michael Crane+, Mar 2003)
- Variable side pools (Art Grater+, July 2011)
- Vegas trip report (fall 2004) (Gregg Cattanach, Nov 2004)
- Vegas trip report (spring 2005) (Gregg Cattanach, May 2005)
- Videotaping matches (André Nicoulin+, Nov 2000)
- What is a "Monrad format"? (Daniel Murphy, Sept 2000)
- What is a "side pool"? (Daniel Murphy, Nov 1997)