Forum Archive :
Match Equities
Here are my personal equity charts which I have developed over the years.
I tend to lean more towards a cubeless gammon frequency (CGF) of 25 percent
in my play, but I recognize that the more accepted level today is around
the 35 percent level. Elliott, feel free to contact me about how the
Crawford Rule has been taken into account, or what assumptions I have made
about the value of owning the cube, and at which point a mandatory double
is required by the trailing party. And if you do decide to repost or
publish the charts, I only ask that you properly identify them as mine.
Enjoy.
EQUITY CHART FOR 11 POINT MATCH WITH CGF = 35.00%
10c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
10c 50.00% 50.00% 66.25% 75.00% 80.28% 83.13% 87.69% 90.14% 92.55% 93.84% 95.42% 96.27%
10 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 66.25% 66.25% 80.28% 80.28% 87.69% 87.69% 92.55% 92.55% 95.42%
9 33.75% 50.00% 50.00% 64.03% 73.15% 79.50% 84.64% 88.21% 91.06% 93.03% 94.68% 95.84%
8 25.00% 33.75% 39.03% 50.00% 60.90% 68.93% 75.91% 81.18% 85.46% 88.64% 91.23% 93.16%
7 19.72% 33.75% 33.75% 44.72% 50.00% 60.39% 67.86% 74.44% 79.78% 84.04% 87.49% 90.19%
6 16.88% 19.72% 24.28% 34.86% 42.49% 50.00% 59.02% 66.33% 72.77% 78.08% 82.51% 86.10%
5 12.31% 19.72% 19.72% 29.74% 35.67% 43.62% 50.00% 58.47% 65.36% 71.56% 76.82% 81.26%
4 9.86% 12.31% 14.72% 23.28% 29.17% 36.48% 43.54% 50.00% 57.85% 64.47% 70.48% 75.66%
3 7.45% 12.31% 12.31% 19.91% 24.35% 30.89% 37.20% 43.98% 50.00% 57.42% 63.76% 69.58%
2 6.16% 7.45% 9.03% 15.67% 19.69% 25.57% 31.46% 37.74% 44.15% 50.00% 57.03% 63.14%
1 4.58% 7.45% 7.45% 13.16% 16.24% 21.30% 26.50% 32.30% 38.23% 44.38% 50.00% 56.71%
0 3.73% 4.58% 5.51% 10.38% 13.06% 17.46% 22.08% 27.33% 32.90% 38.65% 44.55% 50.00%
(c) D. Escoffery 1991
EQUITY CHART FOR 11 POINT MATCH WITH CGF = 25.00%
10c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
10c 50.00% 50.00% 68.75% 75.00% 82.03% 84.38% 89.36% 91.02% 93.76% 94.68% 96.33% 96.88%
10 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 68.75% 68.75% 82.03% 82.03% 89.36% 89.36% 93.76% 93.76% 96.33%
9 31.25% 50.00% 50.00% 63.28% 73.24% 79.52% 84.98% 88.44% 91.45% 93.35% 95.06% 96.15%
8 25.00% 31.25% 38.28% 50.00% 61.25% 69.59% 76.79% 82.04% 86.38% 89.49% 92.04% 93.87%
7 17.97% 31.25% 31.25% 42.97% 50.00% 60.16% 68.23% 74.92% 80.45% 84.76% 88.24% 90.90%
6 15.63% 17.97% 22.95% 33.98% 42.02% 50.00% 59.19% 66.80% 73.41% 78.85% 83.34% 86.93%
5 10.64% 17.97% 17.97% 28.02% 34.76% 42.81% 50.00% 58.51% 65.78% 72.14% 77.56% 82.06%
4 8.98% 10.64% 13.39% 22.36% 28.35% 35.73% 43.09% 50.00% 57.98% 64.90% 71.09% 76.41%
3 6.24% 10.64% 10.64% 18.22% 23.14% 29.70% 36.44% 43.44% 50.00% 57.54% 64.18% 70.17%
2 5.32% 6.24% 7.89% 14.63% 18.69% 24.44% 30.55% 37.05% 43.71% 50.00% 57.17% 63.55%
1 3.67% 6.24% 6.24% 11.71% 15.07% 19.99% 25.39% 31.35% 37.57% 43.95% 50.00% 56.85%
0 3.12% 3.67% 4.63% 9.45% 12.11% 16.28% 20.96% 26.28% 32.03% 38.03% 44.16% 50.00%
(c) D. Escoffery 1991
EQUITY CHART FOR 11 POINT MATCH WITH CGF = 20.00%
10c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
10c 50.00% 50.00% 70.00% 75.00% 83.00% 85.00% 90.20% 91.50% 94.38% 95.10% 96.77% 97.19%
10 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% 70.00% 70.00% 83.00% 83.00% 90.20% 90.20% 94.38% 94.38% 96.77%
9 30.00% 50.00% 50.00% 63.00% 73.40% 79.66% 85.28% 88.68% 91.75% 93.61% 95.33% 96.37%
8 25.00% 30.00% 38.00% 50.00% 61.46% 69.95% 77.26% 82.52% 86.87% 89.95% 92.48% 94.25%
7 17.00% 30.00% 30.00% 42.00% 50.00% 60.15% 68.49% 75.29% 80.89% 85.23% 88.70% 91.34%
6 15.00% 17.00% 22.20% 33.50% 41.77% 50.00% 59.30% 67.09% 73.81% 79.32% 83.84% 87.43%
5 9.80% 17.00% 17.00% 27.02% 34.21% 42.40% 50.00% 58.60% 66.05% 72.53% 78.02% 82.57%
4 8.50% 9.80% 12.68% 21.80% 27.85% 35.28% 42.83% 50.00% 58.08% 65.18% 71.47% 76.88%
3 5.62% 9.80% 9.80% 17.26% 22.44% 29.06% 36.00% 43.16% 50.00% 57.64% 64.45% 70.55%
2 4.90% 5.62% 7.29% 14.03% 18.10% 23.79% 30.01% 36.65% 43.47% 50.00% 57.27% 63.82%
1 3.23% 5.62% 5.62% 10.90% 14.41% 19.28% 24.75% 30.81% 37.19% 43.72% 50.00% 56.95%
0 2.81% 3.23% 4.18% 8.92% 11.56% 15.60% 20.30% 25.67% 31.52% 37.66% 43.94% 50.00%
(c) D. Escoffery 1991
===========================================================================
David Escoffery Tel: (408) 458-4227 x4621
The Santa Cruz Operation Internet: davide@sco.COM
P.O. Box 1900
Santa Cruz, CA 95061
===========================================================================
|
|
|
|
Match Equities
- Constructing a match equity table (Walter Trice, Apr 2000)
- Does it matter which match equity table you use? (Klaus Evers+, Nov 2005)
- Does it matter which match equity table you use? (Achim Mueller+, Dec 2003)
- Does it matter which match equity table you use? (Chuck Bower+, Sept 2001)
- ME Table: Big Brother (Peter Fankhauser, July 1996)
- ME Table: Dunstan (Ian Dunstan+, Aug 2004)
- ME Table: Escoffery (David Escoffery, Nov 1991)
- ME Table: Friedman (Elliott C Winslow, Oct 1991)
- ME Table: Kazaross (Neil Kazaross, Dec 2003)
- ME Table: Kazaross-XG2 (neilkaz, Aug 2011)
- ME Table: Rockwell-Kazaross (Chuck Bower+, June 2010)
- ME Table: Snowie (Chase, Apr 2002)
- ME Table: Snowie (Harald Retter, Aug 1998)
- ME Table: Woolsey (Raccoon, Apr 2006)
- ME Table: Woolsey (Kit Woolsey, May 1994)
- ME Table: Woolsey (William R. Tallmadge, Jan 1994)
- ME Table: Zadeh (Jørn Thyssen, Mar 2004)
- ME Table: Zorba (Robert-Jan Veldhuizen+, Dec 2003)
- ME at 1-away/2-away (crawford) (Fabrice Liardet+, Nov 2007)
- ME at 1-away/2-away (crawford) (Ian Shaw+, Apr 2003)
- Match equities--an alternate view (Durf Freund, Oct 1994)
- Neil's new numbers (neilkaz, Aug 2011)
- Neil's numbers (Kit Woolsey+, Oct 1994)
- On calculating match equity tables (Neil Kazaross, July 2004)
- Turner formula (Gregg Cattanach, Feb 2003)
- Turner formula (Stephen Turner, June 1994)
- Using a match equity table (Michael J. Zehr, June 1992)
- Value of free drop (Neil Kazaross, Oct 2002)
- Which match equity table is best? (Martin Krainer+, Oct 2003)
- Which match equity table is best? (Ian Shaw+, Dec 2001)
- Why use a match equity table? (Kit Woolsey, Feb 1999)
- Worth memorizing? (Alef Rosenbaum+, Feb 2003)
From GammOnLine
Long message
Recommended reading
Recent addition
|
| |
|