Chouettes

 Jacoby rule

 From: Doug Doub Address: dougdoub@earthlink.net Date: 26 August 2005 Subject: Jacoby Rule Forum: GammOnLine

```A disadvantage of using the Jacoby rule occurs using individual cubes in
a chouette if the captain has not been doubled. He might hang back and
risk getting backgammoned (from an ace point game), while the crew would
love to have him run.

Gammons and backgammons should count regardless of where the cube is,
though this would eliminate the "colorful" Kauder paradox.

Doug
```

 Neil Kazaross  writes: ```As for the captain not being doubled, I've seen this happen once -- the box felt he'd take very late so didn't cube and then rolled a crushing sequence and realized that the captain would stay back because he wasn't cubed, so box didn't cube. One member of the crew nearly came to blows with the captain. After the game, we pointed out to the box that this was rather lame tactics. I agree, the Jacoby rule sucks and takes out some skill in playing for a gammon. If someone doesn't think playing for a gammon on a 1 cube is worth it, raise the stakes. ```

 Daniel  writes: ```Just in case your chouette is unlikely to throw out the Jacoby rule ... Not all individual cube chouettes allow the box to fish'n'choose whom he doubles when. Some chouettes instead require the box to double all cubes of the same value at the same time. This rule prohibits the box from doubling everyone except the captain, which can lead to the situation you describe, in which the captain has a gammon-free play-on for his own 10 or 5 or 1% winning chances, much to the detriment of the team. The occurrence that Neil describes is an example of what that can lead to. I agree that this tactic is "lame" and not fair; in effect the box and captain are implictly colluding against the captain's teammates. I suppose, though, that the (my) preferred rule would not eliminate the possibility of a situation where all but the captain have doubled the box, suffer a reverse in the game, and the box plays for gammon holding some two-cubes with the captain's cube still centered. But I think that situation occurs even more infrequently. ```

### Chouettes

Automatic doubles with carryover  (Alexander Zamanian, Jan 1999)
California rule  (Peter Anderson+, Nov 2001)
Captain drops and others take  (Grafix8888+, Sept 2000)
Chouette cube strategy  (Stanley E. Richards+, Mar 2011)
Cube proxy  (Ilia Guzei+, June 2003)
Dream chouette  (Phil Simborg+, Sept 2009)
Extras  (Daniel Murphy, Feb 1997)
Extras  (Albert Steg, July 1996)
Extras  (Anthony R Wuersch, Mar 1995)
Fish-hunt rules  (Chuck Bower+, Feb 2006)
Interlocking chouette  (wintom+, Jan 2008)
Jacoby rule  (Doug Doub+, Aug 2005)
Legal plays only  (Gregg Cattanach+, Aug 2001)
Los Angeles Rules  (Joe Russell, Apr 2013)
Los Angeles Rules  (Justin N.+, Aug 2011)
Lure of the chouette  (Bob Koca+, July 2004)
Mandatory beaver  (Roland Scheicher+, Mar 2002)
Mandatory beaver  (David Montgomery, Jan 1999)
Money management  (Albert Steg, Sept 1998)
Online chouette rules  (John Graas, July 2003)
Order of succession  (leobueno+, Aug 2011)
Order of succession  (Albert Steg, June 1995)
Procedure when captain doubles  (Bill Riles+, Feb 2010)
Split cube actions  (Neil Kazaross, June 2003)
Strategy  (Michael J. Zehr, Sept 1998)
Variable stakes  (Christopher Yep+, Apr 2000)
Waiting for teammate to double  (Øystein Johansen+, July 2001)
When box takes a partner  (Dan Pelton+, Mar 2009)
When does player retain the box?  (Daniel Murphy, Jan 1997)
When is consulting allowed?  (Dave+, Mar 2000)