Etiquette

Forum Archive : Etiquette

 
Commenting on dice

From:   Ron Barry
Address:   r-abarry@telocity.com
Date:   28 March 2001
Subject:   Internet Backgammon Etiquette
Forum:   rec.games.backgammon
Google:   3AC236A4.7BFB4067@telocity.com

I have recently had the experience of being chastised in the chat
section of Yahoo backgammon for my part in the following exchange:

(1) I was in a disadvantageous situation, made a lucky roll, and
    reversed the advantage with my play (which was an obvious play).

(2) My opponent posted the following in the chat box: "nr", which I
    take to be an acronym for "nice roll".

(3) I posted "Indeed", for lack of anything more cogent to reply.

(4) Whereupon my opponent rather snippily informed me that a simple
    "ty" (for "thank you"?) would have been sufficient (and presumably
    necessary?).

(5) I apologized for my seeming rudeness and proceeded with the game.

My questions are these:    Why would anyone bother to congratulate
another player on having been the recipient of a favorable chance
occurrence, which has nothing to do with the other player's skill? What
should be the appropriate response to such a non sequitur?

Regards, Ron Barry.

Jive Dadson  writes:

I hate that.  It seems the opponent always says "nr" when he's mangled
half of his plays, but he's rolled enough miracles to bury you anyway.
Then you get a good shake and he says, "nr".  Grrrrrrrrr.

I remember once I had been watching my opponent shuffle his checkers
forward randomly as I suffered from chronic entry-failure.  I guess I
must have had trouble clearing my mid point or something like that.
Anyway, I had one man collecting dust on the bar, and all my other men
were on my eight point or lower -- a priming setup, but not a speed
board.  While I was dancing, the opponent had made a five point board
missing the five point, and had scrambled all his checkers home except
one.  His lone straggler was on my nine point -- and he had a one left
to play.  He could shift a free checker in his inner board, or he could
move the straggler forward a pip.  He moved the blot forward.  I knew
what to do!  I correctly rolled double fives.  Whap!  He typed "nr".  I
responded, "dr".  "What does that mean?" he asked.  I typed, "Divine
retribution."

Jive

Douglas Zare  writes:

Your "Indeed" was fine. I usually try to ignore it when my opponents say
"nr" or "vnr." I don't just think of it as a non sequitur; I think it is
often a rude comment suggesting that I win only through rolling well. If
you are sure that your opponent means to be at all abusive rather than just
making a silly comment, ignore them or boot them from the table and never
play them again.

If you tell your opponents that they have had really bad dice, that upsets
them some times, too. I usually save comments like the following for
players I know will appreciate them:

1) Why did you roll that?
2) Did you run over the Dice Fairy's pet?
3) Snowie-Trainer would have rolled 6-6. Equity lost: .435.
4) Another double shot missed! Are you even trying?
5) It's all in the wrist.

Greg Shackleford  writes:

I think more players could learn to be a lot more polite - after all - it
is only a game, what the hell do the ratings matter anyway - not like
there's money riding on it.

A perfect example of a friendly situation was a recent match I had with
Windy on FIBS. This was the 4th round of a small, free tournament. Through
totally flukey dice (namely loads of doubles) I backgammoned him on the
second game and won the 7ptr. He was really good about it - I tend to feel
guilty when FIBS serves up too many doubles like that, but what can you do
- computer dice huh!

Windy congratulated me on my win, and agreed that, whilst the doubles were
a fluke, it happens and ended by saying, 'good match, and good luck.'
Superb bloke. I've met too many who would drop over that situation - it's
happened against me, and I have never dropped (not even a bot, for
shame)!!!
 
Did you find the information in this article useful?          

Do you have any comments you'd like to add?     

 

Etiquette

Am I too slow?  (sevenout+, Apr 2004) 
Am I too slow?  (Stephen Turner, Jan 2002) 
Am I too slow?  (Daniel Murphy, June 1997) 
Commenting on dice  (Ron Barry+, Mar 2001) 
Dealing with droppers  (Bill Hill, Dec 1998) 
Dealing with droppers  (Patti Beadles, Mar 1996) 
Dice cup  (Walt Swan, June 2000) 
Direction of play  (Ric Gerace+, Aug 2001) 
Doubling opponent out  (bustedchucks+, June 2005) 
Doubling to end a game early  (Douglas Zare, Aug 2001) 
Etiquette for online play  (Dean Ayer+, June 1997) 
Going for backgammon in a one-point match  (Douglas Zare, Nov 2000) 
How long to wait?  (Marsha Wisniski+, Dec 1997) 
Listening to music while playing  (Max Urban+, Oct 2009) 
Moving hit checker first  (Timothy Chow+, Oct 2009) 
Premature shaking  (Paul Epstein+, July 2005) 
Rolling the dice  (Julius Selbach+, July 2005) 
Rude conduct  (Igor Schein+, Mar 2003) 
Under resigning  (Bob Newell+, Aug 2004) 
Under resigning  (Ilya Vinogradsky+, May 1994) 
When to quit  (Albert Steg, Nov 1998) 
Why I never complain about the dice  (Phil Simborg, Mar 2004) 

[GammOnLine forum]  From GammOnLine       [Long message]  Long message       [Recommended reading]  Recommended reading       [Recent addition]  Recent addition
 

  Book Suggestions
Books
Cheating
Chouettes
Computer Dice
Cube Handling
Cube Handling in Races
Equipment
Etiquette
Extreme Gammon
Fun and frustration
GNU Backgammon
History
Jellyfish
Learning
Luck versus Skill
Magazines & E-zines
Match Archives
Match Equities
Match Play
Match Play at 2-away/2-away
Miscellaneous
Opening Rolls
Pip Counting
Play Sites
Probability and Statistics
Programming
Propositions
Puzzles
Ratings
Rollouts
Rules
Rulings
Snowie
Software
Source Code
Strategy--Backgames
Strategy--Bearing Off
Strategy--Checker play
Terminology
Theory
Tournaments
Uncategorized
Variations

 

Return to:  Backgammon Galore : Forum Archive Main Page