|
I saw someone make a disparaging remark about "Backgammon for Blood" the
other day. It's true, it doesn't stand up against modern strategy, but
taken in context of the time it was a pretty radical and useful book. I'm
going from long-ago memories, but as I recall it championed playing
"unsafe" moves and advocated staying flexible if your opponent got a couple
of good rolls and you ended up playing a back game. Back in the historical
days, people advocated playing "safe" above almost everything else -- you
could tell the inexperienced players because they'd leave more than one
blot on the board -- and the ideas in BfB could make you a dangerous player
to run up against. Granted, today Jellyfish cleans my clock if I drop back
into those old playing habits....
>>>==>PStJTT
|